Something's Fishy In Orlando
Junious
Ricardo Stanton
Something's Fishy In Orlando
In the aftermath of the shooting
in Orlando it
appears that there are numerous anomalies many critical thinkers and skeptics
are pointing out about the government narrative. Many of these anomalies have
become standard operating procedure in what are becoming increasingly apparent
in these psychological operations/false flag ops. There is something very fishy
about the Orlando
shootings. I am not saying people weren't shot injured or killed in the Pulse
nightclub, what I am saying is the corporate mind control apparatus/government propaganda
machine's "official" narrative do not add up.
What first
caught my attention was the media kept replaying the same scenes over and over
again: we repeatedly were shown the exterior of the nightclub, police cars with
flashing lights that had cordoned off the immediate area and repeated scenes of
"civilians" assisting the wounded. Even as time went on, hours passed and the days
wore on the scenes didn't change that much except for the various people interviewed.
What raised a red flag for me was what we were not shown: the inside of the
club (granted the carnage may have been to gruesome to show), we did not see
any ambulances on the scene or vans transporting injured people or body bags
from the nightclub or scenes outside the medical examiners office.
We saw the
FBI, mayor, several local elected officials making statements but no hospital
or coroner representatives were ever shown explaining the process of
identifying the victims or the types of medical treatment they were getting. To
me this was extremely fishy and indicated there is something amiss in this
affair, something irregular and even nefarious. Again I am not saying there was
no shooting, I am saying the narrative, media accounts and visuals are
disingenuous.
When I
first heard about the incident I scoured the Internet to get more information.
Obviously not everything on the Internet is factual but it is a valuable source
of information and a way to cross reference and double check what has been
reported. based upon what I saw, immediately I became skeptical. According to
the reports an off duty police officer working security at the nightclub
engaged the perpetrator Omar Mateen in a gun battle outside the nightclub at
which time Mateen ran into the club. Another version stated Mateen went intothe
club and a firefight ensued with the security guard. Then three additional police officers
responded and they went into the club and engaged in a firefight with Mateen.
But
according to several eye witnesses there was more than one shooter and one man
even blocked the exit preventing people from escaping! The corporate mind
control apparatus has so far ignored that lead or account. Then we get several
differing accounts about what happened inside the club. They say people ran
into the bathroom. Was it the same bathroom or different bathrooms? Supposedly
Mateen came into the bathroom(s) asked if there were any Black people in there?
Supposedly one person responded yes. One witness said Mateen stated "he
didn't have anything against Black people". Another witness said Mateen
started shooting wounding and killing several patrons who were in the stalls
several who were Black!?
Then he supposedly barricaded himself in a
bathroom with hostages for three hours. Subsequently SWAT teams arrived, the
order was given by the Orlando Police Chief and they created a "controlled
explosion"; meaning they blow a hole in the outside wall of the nightclub
(which supposedly allowed several trapped patrons to escape). Then after that
they breeched the bathroom wall and several more hostages ran out. Subsequently
Mateen came out shooting and was subsequently killed by police and Sheriff's
officers.
Amidst all
the focus on Mateen and the accounts by the media talking heads there were no
visuals of the inside of the nightclub or bodies being removed in body bags.
The initial reports stated Mateen used an AR-15 but when people started saying
that weapon was used in other mass shooting, the story changed to he used a Sig
Sauer MCX.
Okay I can see that as an honest error, but
then again it wasn't changed until a few days later when people like me made
the connection with Orlando
and other mass shootings and the use of an AR-15! In a piece I initially wrote
about the shootings, I questioned the designation of the Orlando
shooting as the "deadliest mass murder in US history". I pointed out
massacres of Indigenous peoples here in this country and the deadly race riots
in Tulsa Oklahoma
as far more deadly.
The
mainstream propaganda machine countered by saying the Native American killings
were military actions while the Orlando
shooting was a individual action. No mention about Rosewood or Tulsa
was made in the Washington Post rebuttal https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/06/16/serious-reporters-address-your-viral-orlando-shooting-hoaxes-theories-and-conspiracies/
to the supposed "conspiracy theories" about the Orlando shootings. The Washington Post gave the modern
definition of "mass shooting" as " more than four people killed in a single
incident by a criminal gunman (or, rarely, gunmen or gunwomen)." Then they
provide a list of US mass shootings and the number killed. Many of these
incidents are also suspected by many as false flag ops.
More and
more people are questioning the official narrative and critiquing the photos
and visuals. One thing that stands out is that it was civilians who were
rescuing and treating the victims not first responders. Where were the first
responders other than the police in all this?
There is strong
suspicion many of the so called eye witnesses are what are called "crisis
actors" people who are paid to act like victims, give prewritten accounts
of the happening or act like grieving friends relatives and bystanders. A key
way to tell is if they don't shed real tears they just mimic emotion. We saw
some of that with the Orlando
situation.
In one
visual some "civilians" carry a "wounded" man and place him
in a open ended pick up truck!? This was all for show because the truck doesn't
drive off and even if it did who knows where it went?
Who
benefits from something like this whether they were directly behind it or not?
There are several very obvious agendas at play here. We saw one when it was
stated that Mateen (correctly or not) was a radicalized Muslim linked to ISIS even though no actual proof was supplied, so the
anti-Islam perpetrators win. The deep security state and military industrial
complex win, the US CIA Director just testified before Congress that ISIS is at the gates. The media wins because events like
this generate more viewers, more advertising and they can sow more fear, more
anti-Islam ooga booga, which in turn generates more money for domestic spying
and draconian laws to further the police state!
Homosexual,
transgender, alternative lifestyle activists really win. They mobilized so fast
it was almost like they were ready in waiting for something exactly like this
to happen. They have defined it as a "hate crime" even though no
facts have been provided to support such a claim. CNN has been using this angle
since Monday, gaining sympathy, empathy and connection with the GLTBQ
communities. Now they are saying Mateen was gay himself so where is the hate
angle?
Of course the anti-gun crusaders will win
there is even talk about repealing the Second Amendment to the US
Constitution! Obama and the Democrats will push for more gun control laws and
guns will be demonized rather than the criminogenic, violent culture we live
in.
Who loses?
Us in the form of more mind entrainment, more laws that treat ordinary citizens
as terrorists and more of our tax money being used to fund the deep security police state
as opposed to fixing the infrastructure, the economy and working for global
peace. Don't fall for the okey-doke,
keep an open mind, question everything and think for yourself!
-30-
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home