Tuesday, July 26, 2005

Things That Make you Go, Huh?

Things That Make you Go, Huh?


“With the unpopularity of the war in Iraq growing, and with Bush's political troubles mounting, bombing London now makes no sense for "honest terrorists," i.e., terrorists not being run by the US, which has used terrorism as a tool of foreign policy for decades. Why risk increasing Bush's popularity when it is at an all-time low? The way to get European troops out of Iraq is to get the Americans out. Would Denmark stay if the US left? Attacks in Europe strengthen Bush's "resolve" to stay the course, and the few nations who have not joined "the coalition of the leaving" would stay with the Americans. (Conservative Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi announced on July 8 that Italy would probably begin its withdrawal in September. Italy has been talking about a withdrawal for several months).
While it makes no sense for alleged extremists to attack now, it makes all the sense in the world for the neocons to order an attack, even on the soil of America's closest ally. There has to be an actual attack from time to time to keep the fear level up. And what's a few more lives taken when these war criminals have squandered so many thousands of others? If an attack distracts the press from Bush's political woes, ups the fear level in the American and British populace and makes increases in war spending and decreases in civil liberties easier for legislatures to vote for, so be it. You can't make an omelet if you don't break some eggs.” Timely Terrorism Kellia Ramares, Online Journal

Ask yourself why would an hitherto unknown “Al- Qaeda” cell/sect in Europe go and bomb the London transportation system just when news was leaked Britain would be withdrawing some of its’ imperialist forces from Iraq next year? Why would an organization bent on opposing Western aggression in Muslim countries strike now just when one of the three main instigators of such aggression (AmeriKKKa and Israel are the other two) caved into massive anti-war sentiment and decided to bring some of their troops home? Would a real terrorist do such a thing given their goal to drive the “infidels” out was about to be accomplished? Does this make any sense to you? Perhaps that is why there is so much skepticism about the London bombings themselves especially since the “official” story changes daily. If you are a person of color in the United States of AmeriKKKa, you know first hand the ruthlessness and brutality the US government is capable of. If you are a student of history, you know the US government lies and has lied to further the interests of the elitist shot callers and deal makers and they could care less if they had to murder a few innocent men, women and children or kill millions in their wars of conquest. Remember the campaign of genocide against the native inhabitants of the Western Hemisphere? Has it skipped your remembrance the Catholic Church sanctioned the Trans-Atlantic slave trade and the Pope himself blessed the ships and brutes that carried those atrocities out? Have you forgotten the Klu Klux Klan is a Christian organization, whose primary tactic is terrorism and once upon a time to be a member in good standing in the white community in AmeriKKKa in the North, South, East and West you had to be a member or supporter of the KKK!!! See the chilling pictorial exhibit “Without Sanctuary” to get a glimpse just how savage white people can be.
Given this reality, what makes you think the US CIA British MI5, MI6 or Israeli Mossad weren’t the ones behind the recent London “attacks”? After all the Zionists blew up hundreds of innocents in the British King David Hotel on July 22, 1946 in Jerusalem in their quest to establish Israel. It makes more sense to believe an axis of evil (AmeriKKKa, Britain Israel) special op team did the bombings than believe some cave dwelling Muslim fanatics pulled off 9-11 all by themselves or that some “secret” offshoot of an organization that really is the figment of the CIA orchestrated the London bombings. After all who benefits from the bombing? Certainly not the anti-occupation forces, Britain was going to pull their troops out and so is Italy! The New World Order gang are the only ones who really benefit; they get to ratchet up the fear of the al-Qaeda bogeyman and keep the press on for their trans-generational War on Terrorism (their blatant crusade for oil, empire and global lock down) and squelch some of the resistence to the war and Bush and Blair's policies. Bush definitely benefits because the bombings took some of the pressure off of Karl Rove, Bush’s wilting approval ratings, his floundering policy agenda and the continuously dismal news from Iraq. Folks aren’t as dumb as the NWO boys think. That’s why so many people around the world are so skeptical of the timing of the London bombings and have refused to fall for the secret al-Qaeda cell did it okie-doke. Yeah, it’s about time!

-30-

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home