Monday, April 20, 2020

Are We In The Midst of a COVID 19 Psychological Operation




Are We In The Midst of A Psychological War?
Junious Ricardo Stanton

“Psychological Operations (PSYOP) or Psychological Warfare (PSYWAR) is simply learning everything about your target enemy, their beliefs, likes, dislikes, strengths, weaknesses, and vulnerabilities. Once you know what motivates your target, you are ready to begin psychological operations. Psychological operations may be defined broadly as the planned use of communications to influence human attitudes and behavior ... to create in target groups behavior, emotions, and attitudes that support the attainment of national objectives.” Psychological Operations/Warfare Major Ed Rouse (retired) http://www.psywarrior.com/psyhist.html

Due to our lack of media literacy most of us cannot fathom or realize we are being targeted and manipulated all the time by the mainstream media, advertising and PR firms, marketers and the government. We are targeted by corporations and the government using deliberately designed psychological techniques to mold our attitudes and beliefs, re-engineer our behavior and create a fake “reality”.
Unless you are in the military or you work for an advertising firm, public relations company, some form of mass media or in selected academic environments, most of us are totally unaware of what these specific groups are doing to us all the time. We are unconscious of how we are being indoctrinated and manipulated.
What they are doing is using designed messages to prompt specific responses and behavior that benefit them, not us! This is what modern advertising and propaganda are all about. In a very real sense it is psychological warfare also called psychological operations (pys-ops). Here is what a retired US military Psychological Operations Officer who calls himself a psywarrior wrote about this process, “A psychological warfare campaign is a war of the mind. Your primary weapons are sight and sound. PSYOP can be disseminated by face-to-face communication, audio visual means (television), audio media (radio or loudspeaker), visual media (leaflets, newspapers, books, magazines and/or posters). The weapon is not how it’s sent, but the message it carries and how that message affects the recipient.” Psychological Operations/Warfare Major Ed Rouse (retired) http://www.psywarrior.com/psyhist.html
When you look at the news today based upon what I have just shared, you could easily and rightly conclude we are the targets of a nefarious and sophisticated psychological operation designed to cause panic, hysteria and pliability with regards to this COVID 19 situation.
In the article I just cited Major Rouse says, “… it’s not how it’s sent but the message it carries and how that message affect the recipient.” What is the message being sent by the corporate media about COVID 19? Let’s decode it. Essentially the message is, the virus is lethal, it is global, and you must be afraid, you must trust us and comply with what we say in order to be safe.
We are always shown escalating numbers about people infected and the rising death toll along with images of the COVID 19 coronavirus. We are shown debilitated old people on ventilators and in hospitals. They (the government and media) tell us we have to shut down the global economy, stay cooped up in the house, believe whatever they tell us and do whatever they say!
Because they have sown fear and panic many of us have abdicated their ability to think critically and rationally. But ask yourself why don’t they ever show us figures of the number of people who have recovered, or tell us about the people who had it and said it was mild? Why is it always the worst case scenarios? The answer is they want us to be scared, afraid and compliant!
Make no mistake, COVID 19 is very real. It is a respiratory infection that is contagious. But it is not the plague. Go to https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ and see the numbers for yourself. Look at how many people recover, look at the numbers of infected people and then realize there are eight billion people on this planet! These mainstream media numbers are way out of proportion to those numbers so they must be running a psy-op! Look at the mortality rates they list for COVID 19 then look at the deaths from the flu and influenza in the past year.  https://www.statnews.com/2018/09/26/cdc-us-flu-deaths-winter/ and https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/flu_pneumonia_mortality/flu_pneumonia.htm
Then look at the messengers, let’s identify them. One is Johns Hopkins University the same entity that held a table top exercise in October of 2019 centered on lethal pandemic scenarios. http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/players/index.html  Look at who is promoting lockdowns and vaccines, and you’ll see Bill Gates a known proponent of eugenics (racist birth control and depopulation) who stands to make millions off of any vaccine that comes to the market and we have the World Health Organization which is sponsored and supported by Big Pharma https://www.globalpolicy.org/home/270-general/52830-who-do-financial-contributions-from-pharma-violate-who-guidelines.html and we have the CDC which also pushes Big Pharma.
We are constantly bombarded with messages to manipulate us using psychological techniques that generate feelings of inadequacy, longing, lust, which stoke our addictions to prompt us to buy their products. Many of you know this. But you should also know the government and special interest groups also use psychological techniques to shape our worldview, our beliefs, perceptions and “reality”.
We are constantly being programmed, conditioned, brainwashed and herded by what Vance Packard called Hidden Persuaders. This COVID 19 scenario is no different. Next week I’ll share additional aspects of this psy-op , who and how it benefits other members of the .001%

                                                -30-



 




Monday, April 06, 2020

You've Been Had, You've Been Took




You’ve Been Had, You’ve Been Took
Junious Ricardo Stanton

“Ah, I say you been mislead, you’ve been had, you’ve been took.”- Malcolm X

            We’ve been had. We’ve been duped into believing the COVID 19 virus is a plague when in fact it is a contagious respiratory infection not the deadly pandemic we are being led to believe it is.  You say, you’re not an epidemiologist or a virologist, how do you know this? You are correct I am not a scientist or statistician but I know how to read, I know how to do research and I have common sense.
 When we stop to think about the media bombardment we’re currently subjected to, we have to conclude there has been only one narrative put before us by the government, the CDC and World Health Organization; and this narrative has created an atmosphere of fear and panic. Whether this is deliberate I can’t say for sure, all I know is most of what we see and hear in the media is negative and discouraging so it doesn’t matter what the intent is, the results are the same.
The CDC, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, World Economic Forum and World Health Organization narrative have a monopoly on airplay and dissemination by the media conglomerates. All we hear night and day over and over is worst case scenarios. But there are other findings by epidemiologists, virologists, statisticians and public health officials that are not getting air time. We need to see all the facts and options.
            We have not been told for instance the tests for COVID 19 are not reliable.  There have been several problems with the tests which are to be expected since this virus is new and no tests previously existed for it. This is what an Associated Press article had to say about that, “To help increase the number of people being screened, the Food and Drug Administration issued emergency authorization for CDC-certified labs run by state health departments to begin processing swabs, and they were provided with kits that could test 250 patients.  As the first tests were processed at the state labs, technicians reported getting inconclusive results, which the CDC has said could be due to the test looking for signs of generic coronaviruses, of which there are many, rather than the specific virus that causes COVID-19.” Testing blunders crippled US response as coronavirus spread https://apnews.com/c335958b1f8f6a37b19b421bc7759722
            Also there have been high percentages of false negatives and false positives, this inaccuracy posses challenges for public health officials. “The problem is that tests almost never have 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The test and the truth together create four possibilities: true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives. There’s a trade-off involved because an increasingly liberal test (more sensitive) will include more and more individuals in the population who do not actually have the disease (less specific). This trade-off has important implications for interpreting Covid-19 population trends based on testing to date and going forward.
For Covid-19 testing, the threshold for calling a test positive should not be set too high. Failing to isolate someone who actually has Covid-19 and sending her back to a nursing home would be put many people in harm’s way. But if the bar for calling a test positive is set too low, then a subset of patients who do not have Covid-19 will test positive for it.” COVID 19 testing: overcoming challenges in the next phase of the epidemic - ARJUN K. MANRAI and KENNETH D. MAND https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/31/covid-19-overcoming-testing-challenges/
             The fact is the exact number of people who are or have been infected with COVID 19 is unknown for many reasons, poor testing, inaccurate numbers and reports for example. This is a new phenomenon that is still dynamic so exact figures are hard to come by. When we examine the literature we can see some organizations are predicting higher mortality rates based upon faulty models or data which is not good. “Other metrics used to gauge the scale of the outbreak, such as hospitalizations and deaths, have their own limitations. Not all states are reporting hospitalizations, and once hospitals are full, additional cases might not show up in reported figures. Death statistics are also a function of case-by-case diagnosis and cause-of-death methodology. Many deaths due to COVID-19 may have been—and many more may continue to be—misdiagnosed as the result of pneumonia or another respiratory ailment. With time and increased testing, the state of this outbreak will come into focus. But leaders should be humble, and citizens must be patient, about the fact that no single metric is gospel right now. Even many health statistics taken together can offer at best an incomplete picture of the scope of the crisis.” All The Coronavirus Statistics Are Flawed Derek Thompson The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/fog-pandemic/608764/
            COVID 19 is a contagious respiratory condition similar to influenza and the flu. What we are not hearing or seeing in the charts and graphs presented by the corporate media is most people who do not have pre-existing underlying medical conditions recover quickly and for many the symptoms are mild! We cannot allow the media to create fear and hysteria which in turn creates stress and panic which lowers our immune system’s ability to fight infection.
It is imperative we maintain a well functioning immune system. Our confidence in our own body’s ability to fight infection and our own ability to promote a healthy immune system must be greater than our fear of the coronavirus!  Don’t allow the media scare machine, what Catherine Austin Fitts calls the shriekometer, to punk you. Use common sense, do what you can to promote a healthy immune system and have confidence in your body’s ability to protect and heal you.

                                                            -30-

           

Saturday, April 04, 2020

More To This Than Meets The Eye




More To This Than Meets The Eye
Junious Ricardo Stanton

“In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 in collaboration with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Recently, the Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.” http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/newsroom/center-news/2020-01-24-Statement-of-Clarification-Event201.html

Once the COVID 19 began to spread it came to the attention of some that in October a group of high profile entities came together to conduct a table top scenario exercise dealing with a global pandemic that in their scenario kills sixty-five million people. Because it was done in collaboration with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation many became suspicious when the COVID 19 coronavirus began to spread in January of 2020. Once these suspicions went viral, the sponsors/planners of Event 201 spoke up saying it was merely an exercise not a predictor of future events.
Maybe so, maybe not; what is now known is much of the global response to COVID 19 is similar to what Event 201 rolled out in their scenario. But this is not the only example of a power elite think exercise being used as a model for social change. In 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation published a paper entitled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development. In that paper differing scenarios were offered surrounding a global pandemic. The stated purpose of the paper according to the Rockefeller Foundation was. “The goal of this project was not to affirm what is already known and knowable about what is happening right now at the intersections of technology and development. Rather, it was to explore the many ways in which technology and development could co-evolve—could both push and inhibit each other—in the future, and then to begin to examine what those possible alternative paths may imply for the world’s poor and vulnerable populations. Such an exercise required project participants to push their thinking far beyond the status quo, into uncharted territory.” http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf
Go to the Website and peruse the report; it like the 2019 Event 201 scenario provides deep insight into how the power elite think what they think about and what their motives are. They are very thorough in their approach and their conclusions. The Rockefeller Foundation’s first of four scenario narratives is called Lock Step, it begins on page 18. In it they imagine a world wide pandemic describing which governments reacted the most favorably. In their scenario governments like China (both in their scenario and later in real life) that took the most aggressive, extreme and socially restrictive actions had the best results! Reading the Lock Step scenario you get the impression the writers favor a more authoritarian approach in dealing with situations such as these. The other three scenarios offer differing narratives and outcomes.
As I indicated the report is through. For example in the narrative on Lock Step technology they say, “Technological innovation in ‘Lock Step’ is largely driven by government and is focused on issues of national security and health and safety. Most technological improvements are created by and for developed countries, shaped by governments’ dual desire to control and to monitor their citizens. In states with poor governance, large-scale projects that fail to progress abound.” My emphasis Ibid page 23
If this was the product of a few academicians and nerds you could shrug it off but the Rockefeller Family and Foundation are long known to favor global governance, their cohorts at the Bill and Belinda Gates Foundation push mandatory vaccinations and both entities promote eugenics (selective human breeding). No way these exercises are coincidences. Keep in mind the Rockefeller Foundation was a major funder of both the American and Nazi eugenics movements. https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1796
Call me paranoid or just skeptical but I see Event 201 and Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development as blueprints, models and manuals for the global lockdown we are experiencing now. Remember Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called the current situation, a live exercise. On March 20 at a White House press briefing he said, “This is not about retribution, this matter is going forward — we are in a live exercise here to get this right.” https://www.europereloaded.com/live-exercise-pompeo-lets-slip-how-he-sees-the-covid-19-pandemic/ 
There is definitely more going on here than meets the eye.

                                                -30-